The History Channel (#Notquitehistorychannel) has been
trumpeting this mini series for a couple months. Last night it made it's debut.
As a proud Texian and history buff I had put this on my 'must watch'
list. Everyone knows my passion for Texas
and I have had several ask if I had plans to watch and even a text to let me know it was on. It's a
great story to read about even without a TV series to enhance the appeal. Why they thought changing it with falsehoods
would make it better escapes my feeble mind.
My first doubt crept in when that guy they picked to play
General Sam showed up in a few commercials.
I wasn't really impressed much at that time with who they chose, but
would withhold judgment until the actual show.
It starts right away with the Alamo already fallen and the aftermath of
that. Did you know there was a male
survivor? No? I didn't either, but the History Channel put one in their
show, there was a male survivor but he was a noncombatant. Jim Bowie's slave. But it wasn't him. They actually executed a black combatant in this show. The Yellow Rose was there also
and survived, yet I don't recall ever reading anything about Ms. Emily being
there. She and Susanna Dickinson and a
couple other ladies that survived the Alamo also got attacked by Comanche's as
Mexican troops ferried them to who knows where. I hadn't heard or read about any of that either and we are just
20 minutes into the show. There are many more details they omitted or changed to suit them that I won't list here. Kim is being
very quiet at this point as she is listening to me and sometimes
chuckling. She knows how bent I get
about inaccurate history, but to do that to the Texas story is almost as bad as
changing what is says in the Bible to me.
Sacrilege.
Other things I just couldn't get past was the set
itself. There is nothing where these
'true' events happened that even remotely resembled these locations. The costuming seemed off to me. I am not an expert about that sort of
thing, but most of the hats looked wrong, the rifles/muskets looked wrong. I also don't think anyone of the Texian army had uniforms at that time unless they had an American uniform. Also their idea of what a Texas Ranger at
that time was, was way off also which is where this is supposed to lead, into the history of the Texas Rangers. And the acting. Oh my the acting. Maybe
it was the goofy script/dialogue that caused the acting to seem so bad. The acting was painful to watch.
I gave it a chance, I really did. I so wanted this to be good, on the order of the Lonesome Dove
series good, and that was fiction but resembled the Charles Goodnight story
closer than this Texas Rising monstrosity did.
I was determined to sit through at least the entire first 2 hour
show. Nope, didn't make it. I just couldn't stand it any longer. Glad I didn't watch their Bible series last
year. I may have had a heart attack.
Now we will have more people that use TV as their guide to
history believing some sort of new garbage.
This series was taken from a book by the same name, that is supposed to
be a true account of this period of Texas.
I had it on my wish list. The
show has left such a bad taste in my mouth, I am not sure I will ever read it
now.
Don't waste your time with this, do something else. If you want a really good book to read about
this period of Texas history I can recommend one and another that encompasses a
longer time frame of Texas history. Hit
me up if you're so inclined.
Happy Trails
1 comment:
I actually forgot to watch, now I'm GLAD I missed it... sigh
Post a Comment